WARNING: Lignite Coal Litigation

Here for a video

Lignite Coal Litigation

Retha Colclasure | 11/2/2011

More than 30 million tons of lignite coal are produced in North Dakota every year. That`s enough to generate electricity for more than 2 million people. Much of that coal is sold to Minnesota. But a law in Minnesota makes it nearly impossible for that to continue.

North Dakota attorney general Wayne Stenehjem announced this morning that he filed a lawsuit against Minnesota over its Next Generation Energy Act.

North Dakota is home to the largest single deposit of lignite coal in the world. It`s more coal than a state with fewer than 650,000 people needs, so selling the coal to other states is big business.

“The future of the lignite industry is at stake, because we cannot develop new projects with a law that basically says that they shall decide how many CO2 emissions and what form and what technology should be used,” said John Dwyer, with the Lignite Energy Council.

He`s talking about a 2007 law passed by Minnesota`s state legislature. The Next Generation Energy Act imposes strict restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generated outside of Minnesota but used within the state`s borders.

Note the this CO2 emissions regulations is based on FAKE FALSE science that is now under Inspector General investigation.  here.

WE NEED TO STOP THE EPA THEY ARE DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY for environmentalism religions.

Stenehjem said, “In practical effect, Minnesota has subjected energy projects located out of Minnesota to onerous regulatory burdens.”

Stenehjem says it`s not only burdensome, it`s against the Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution. So he filed a federal lawsuit, with the backing of several major coal industries.

“To single out one source of energy over another, particularly in this case, coal, I`ve never fully understood,” added Ron Harper, CEO and general manager of Basin Electric Poser Cooperative.

Stenehjem says North Dakota is a vital source of electricity for Minnesota consumers, and in turn, Minnesota had been a good business partner for the coal industry here. But he says this law gets in the way of that.

Stenehjem says because of the chilling effects of the Act, less coal will be mined in North Dakota causing a detriment to the state`s industry.

Minnesota`s legislature had voted to overturn parts of the act this year, but that was vetoed by Gov. Mark Dayton. Several exemptions to the law had been made for companies located in Minnesota or owned by Minnesota-based companies.

Advertisements

About Mississippi Coal
Welcome! It is an honor to have a moment of your day. We are in favor of all forms of energy. We care about the future of this great Nation and seek to expose the corruption behind the Kemper County CO2 capturing experimental Lignite coal Demonstration unit. Our Chief complaint is that the rate payers pay for it in their electric bills. The CO2 capturing does not produce electricity so therefore serves no purpose for the ratepayers. It is a money scam for Mississippi power and Southern Company. Mississippi is first in following the (United Nation's Agenda 21) Kyoto Protocols for the regulation of carbon dioxide, a gas we breathe out of our lungs, by forcing the people to pay for it through energy bills and taxes. Through the process of investigating the Kemper County Coal Plant issue, we feel criminal acts have been committed and that soon FCC violations will be added to the offenses. People are being lied to, deceived, or misled and therefore are fully cooperating with this Lignite experiment. "This blog or any content may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of political pathways, Constitutional infringements, democracy, science, and other issues. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is compiled and distributed without profit. This blog does not always agree with certain personal views or agendas of the published authors, but we will overlook such views many times in order to present facts, conclusions, and connections for knowledge or clarification. We hope you gain from this critical subject matter of the article/op-ed."

Do you have a question comment or information please reply.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: